Folks: The new antenneX
online issue #159 for the month of July 2010 is ready to read at your pleasure!
IN THIS ISSUE
We again include many fine articles by our global writing team. Now, please allow
me to introduce this month's line-up of content:
OUR MONTHLY COLUMNS:
- Antenna
Modeling By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL (SK)
This column has ended after
12 years, 3 months. 25 published posthumously.
Click here for more plans ahead
-
From the Shack
By Ian D. Brown, G3TVU
Radio Mobile - What can it do for you? Part 13 -
Picture and
Data Export
In
previous parts we have seen how to perform all the different types of Single
Polar and Combined Cartesian coverage plots from single and multiple fixed
units. This was followed by information on antenna files and their
generation for use in Radio Mobile, and then on the methods of handling
large pictures and maps.
This was followed in part 12 by describing the way in which ‘User defined’
pictures and unit locations could be imported and used in the program.
Next we will consider the various forms of Data which can be exported from
the program, from pictures and units into Google Earth to network data sets
into a spreadsheet.
In this case I will be using my Base Network once more and utilising some of
the files generated in part 12 as the picture sources.
So we will:- First: See how to export saved pictures directly into Google Earth.
Second: Show how Unit locations can be exported as placemarks to Google
Earth.
Third: Export ‘Radio Link’ data and Units to be visualised in Google Earth
and see how different Fresnel zone data is represented.
Fourth: Export a complete Network unit locations and the Radio Link
representation for display in Google Earth.
Fifth: Consider Network data and parameter export to a spreadsheet.
-
Ham WorkShop
By
Justin Johnson, G0KSC
A compact 3-element 10m Yagi for home building
Within this article we look at the sourcing of parts
and building of a simple 3-element Yagi for 10m using a folded dipole rather
than a split dipole radiating element. The reason for choosing a folded
dipole driven element is to ensure an excellent level of performance is
achieved without too many compromises and in a manner that is relatively
simple to construct.
For the sake of explanation, we will segregate Yagis into 2 categories; the
50Ω direct feed Yagi and the ‘lower’ impedance Yagi. The 50Ω Yagi can
provide good levels of performance and wide bandwidth however, 4 or more
elements are required for an acceptable level of F/B (front to back ratio)
to be achieved if you want to retain both the bandwidth and 50Ohm feedpoint.
With a lower impedance Yagi, better levels of both forward gain and F/B can
be achieved with the sacrifice of a little antenna bandwidth.
I have designed this antenna to be very compact in order that amateurs that
thought 10m was above their station capabilities, can install and use this
Yagi and can expect to see some very good results as we move further into
solar cycle24.
This antenna has a very short boom length for a 10M
Yagi at only 7’ long. So how is this possible for a 10m Yagi to be so short?
- Stone's Throw!
By Jack L. Stone, Editor-in Chief & Publisher
Alex Approaches!
A monthly column covering breaking news, new concepts and products,
people making news and introduction of the current month's issue articles and its
authorsalthough not limited to this only.
FEATURE ARTICLES IN THE LIBRARY
OF NEW ISSUES:
|
Design of a 2-3-El Full-Performance
Yagi for Portable & Field Use
with No-Tool Configuration Changing
Part 3: Improving 20- and 17-Meter Performance
By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL (SK) |
|
Parts 1 and 2 described the electrical and mechanical design of a
Yagi beam for field and other portable uses. It employed a 12’ boom
for high performance from 3 elements on 15, 12, and 10 meters and
full 2-element performance on 17 and 20 meters. The maximum element
length was 26.33’ to optimize gain and front-to-back ratio on each
band. The beam required no matching section, but connected directly
to a 50-Ω coaxial cable with 1.6:1 SWR or better.
When using 3 elements, the beam provided a free-space forward gain
value of between 6.7 and 7.2 dBi, with a front-to-back ratio of
about 20 dB. In contrast, when using only 2 elements (on 17 and 20
meters), the gain dropped to about 6 dBi, with a front-to-back ratio
barely over 10 dB. One residual question left by the discussion is
whether it might be possible to increase the gain and front-to-back
ratio on the lower bands to values more in keeping with those
obtained on 15 through 10 meters. Of course, the maximum boom length
must remain 12’, and the feedpoint must not require a matching
section or network to arrive at a 50-Ω impedance. As well, the
individual elements must retain the structure assigned to them in
the first two parts of these notes. |
|
Practical Antennas: Part 2.9
By
Marcel H. De Canck, ON5AU |
|
The ionosphere plays a tricky but an important
role to our radio communications, and there is very little we can do
about it. But there is plenty you can do about having a good and
efficient antenna system. Yes, antenna system, it’s not the antenna
itself but the whole part as transmission line, and matching
properly the transceiver and the antenna to the transmission line.
It is a breath-taking concept that a simple length of wire or rod or
tube can transform electrical energy into invisible radio
electro-magnetic waves that can cross the space at the speed of
light.
How does an antenna system works? Why does the antenna radiate
electro-magnetic waves? These questions I heard many times and the
answers are not given with few words. Never-the-less, many books and
some of great weight and complexity have been written about antennas
and many antenna types have been developed and build. Often it is
not comprehensive to the layman to fully understand the whys and
hows of the radiation capabilities of an antenna and these counts
even for the simplest ones like a dipole or a groundplane. Also I
often hear many times misconceptions about antenna properties and
characteristics. To start with, understanding why and how a simple
antenna effective radiates will be explained in a clear view. The
dipole is the best antenna to do that and once the secrets of the
dipole characteristics and properties are fully understood it will
be much easier to have a clear insight of the hows and whys of more
complicated antennas.
The first episodes will handle completely about antenna fundamentals
mostly with the half wavelength dipole as study example. The dipole
is also often a part element of more complicated antennas such as a
Yagi and others. In particular for the low frequency bands, the
dipole is used by many radio amateurs as transmitting or receiving
antenna and its many practical installations and shapes will be
fully studied and explained in a chapter later on. In fact many
other antenna types will become subject to explanation as the
antenna story develops. |
|
NewcomerNotes: Monitoring and Scanning
Antennas
By Robert Gulley, AK3Q |
|
There’s nothing I like more in
radio than snagging an elusive signal miles and miles away
regardless of the band; to my way of thinking, that’s a night
well-spent! But, sometimes I really enjoy listening to things much
closer to home and finding out what is going on in my own back yard
is extremely rewarding. I am talking about police and emergency
scanning of course, and it is something I have enjoyed off and on
since I was about 12 years old. Scanning (or monitoring) as I will
be using the term here includes police, fire, coast guard, aviation,
public utilities, sports stadiums, business, and even things such as
towing services and taxicabs. Anything which broadcasts in the clear
is fair game for listening, and you might be amazed at what you’ll
hear if you have never given a listen before. |
|
Inverted L for HF
by
Owen Duffy, VK1OD |
|
This article
describes a simple Inverted L for the HF bands. The priority
requirements were a single antenna system that is unobtrusive and
compatible with the Icom AH-4 tuner, reasonable performance on 80m,
40m, and 30m bands and frequency agility.
To achieve reasonable performance down to 80m, the wire needs to be
longer than about 35% of a wavelength or 30m. A suitable pair of
supports which could accommodate about 27m of wire were identified.
With 27m as a starting point, NEC models were created for an
Inverted L with a 7.7m vertical section to a suitable anchor point
on the mast, and 19m in the horizontal top leg.
The model was examined for reasonable performance down to 80m, and
avoidance of high driving impedances in any amateur bands. Although
this configuration was fine for the existing HF bands, it resulted
in a very high driving voltage in the 5.0 to 5.5MHz region. In the
hope that we may get some channels in this area, the top section was
reduced to 17.5m to shift the first parallel resonance up to about
6MHz.
The antenna was then constructed and resonances checked against the
model for model verification/calibration, and a bulk loss resistance
was added to the model to calibrate model results to measured load
impedance at the first series resonance. |
|
The New XY-pole Antenna - Part 2
By Edward J. Shortridge, W4JOQ |
|
Part 2 is a continuation of the
previous article XY-pole Part 1 (pronounced Zi-pole). Although the
previous article presented inexpensive and easy-to-build vertical
and horizontal wire antennas, this article will deal mostly with
horizontal versions covering the 75-meter amateur radio phone-band
from 3.65 to 4.0 MHz
As explained in the previous article, the J-pole antenna is a very
narrow-band antenna and is not well-suited to cover even a small
portion of the 75-meter band. This article presents the progression
from a narrow-band J-pole, to the much broader X-pole antenna, which
can cover the entire 75-meter band with a very low SWR. The X-pole
utilizes a small capacitor between the quarter-wave matching
section, and the end of the radiator, in order to achieve greater
bandwidth.
The XY-pole antenna was developed to eliminate the need for a
discrete capacitor component and instead uses an overlap of wires
from the radiator and the quarter-wavelength matching section to
create the same amount of capacitance that might have been used in
the X-pole antenna. Using overlapping wires, the XY-pole antenna
produces the same SWR bandwidth as the X-pole antenna. |
|
Radial System Design & Efficiency In
HF Verticals
By Rudy Severns, N6LF |
The efficiency of
an HF vertical depends on its associated ground system and the soil
over which the antenna is erected. The most direct way to determine
the efficiency of an antenna is to determine the fraction of the
input power which is actually radiated. However, there is a small
complication, what do we mean by "radiated power" and how might we
determine it? It turns out that there are a couple of ways to define
radiated power depending on what we're using the antenna for. One
practical way to address this question is to use NEC modeling which
can provide the actual radiated power and that's where the
information in this note was derived from. Modeling results are
discussed below but details of the modeling itself are given in this
article.
A related efficiency question is the long standing "conventional
wisdom" that shorter radials work better with shorter verticals. It
can be argued that because shorter verticals have significantly
higher field intensities close to the base of the antenna (for a
given input power), which leads to higher ground losses, that it
makes sense that more attention be given to the radial system close
in. While this sounds reasonable I couldn't find any quantitative
justification. So I extended the modeling study to include shorter
antennas to see if the conventional wisdom had any quantitative
basis. |
|
|
For paid subscriber
access go to the login page:
http://www.antennex.com/premium.html
...and select Library of New Issues from the top section #1.
Non-subscriber access, go to the
Guest Rooms (fresh articles there too):
http://www.antennex.com/guests.html
For the premium articles, be sure you have a current subscription and don't miss this new issue.
It's in your best interest to know these things.
To subscribe to premium feature articles:
http://www.antennex.com/signup.htm
For Login help:
http://www.antennex.com/help/need_help.html
Join the Mail List
& Discussion Forum
Do
you have a question?
Hope you enjoy the new issue!
Jack L. Stone, Publisher
antenneX Online Magazine
http://www.antennex.com
jack@antennex.com
~ BE SURE TO VISIT THE SHOPPING SHACK ~
Shipments worldwide ~ plus instant downloads
| Subscription | Books | Software | Antennas | Components | |