jack.gif (2793 bytes)
Jack L. Stone
Publisher

arrows_ORANGE_left.gif (577 bytes) July 2010 arrows_ORANGE_right.gif (593 bytes)
New Issue of antenneX for is Published!

Join the Mail List & Discussion Forum
See Links of Importance at Bottom Too!
Do you have a question?


L.B. Cebik, W4RNL(SK)
But Active Contributor


Folks: The new antenneX online issue #159 for the month of July 2010 is ready to read at your pleasure!

IN THIS ISSUE
We again include many fine articles by our global writing team. Now, please allow me to introduce this month's line-up of content:


OUR MONTHLY COLUMNS:

  • Antenna Modeling By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL (SK)

    This column has ended after 12 years, 3 months. 25 published posthumously.
    Click here for more plans ahead

     
  • From the Shack By Ian D. Brown, G3TVU
    Radio Mobile - What can it do for you?
    Part 13 -
    Picture and Data Export
    In previous parts we have seen how to perform all the different types of Single Polar and Combined Cartesian coverage plots from single and multiple fixed units. This was followed by information on antenna files and their generation for use in Radio Mobile, and then on the methods of handling large pictures and maps.

    This was followed in part 12 by describing the way in which ‘User defined’ pictures and unit locations could be imported and used in the program.

    Next we will consider the various forms of Data which can be exported from the program, from pictures and units into Google Earth to network data sets into a spreadsheet.

    In this case I will be using my Base Network once more and utilising some of the files generated in part 12 as the picture sources.

    So we will:-
    First: See how to export saved pictures directly into Google Earth.

    Second: Show how Unit locations can be exported as placemarks to Google Earth.

    Third: Export ‘Radio Link’ data and Units to be visualised in Google Earth and see how different Fresnel zone data is represented.

    Fourth: Export a complete Network unit locations and the Radio Link representation for display in Google Earth.

    Fifth: Consider Network data and parameter export to a spreadsheet
    .
     
  • Ham WorkShop By Justin Johnson, G0KSC
    A compact 3-element 10m Yagi for home building
    Within this article we look at the sourcing of parts and building of a simple 3-element Yagi for 10m using a folded dipole rather than a split dipole radiating element. The reason for choosing a folded dipole driven element is to ensure an excellent level of performance is achieved without too many compromises and in a manner that is relatively simple to construct.

    For the sake of explanation, we will segregate Yagis into 2 categories; the 50Ω direct feed Yagi and the ‘lower’ impedance Yagi. The 50Ω Yagi can provide good levels of performance and wide bandwidth however, 4 or more elements are required for an acceptable level of F/B (front to back ratio) to be achieved if you want to retain both the bandwidth and 50Ohm feedpoint. With a lower impedance Yagi, better levels of both forward gain and F/B can be achieved with the sacrifice of a little antenna bandwidth.

    I have designed this antenna to be very compact in order that amateurs that thought 10m was above their station capabilities, can install and use this Yagi and can expect to see some very good results as we move further into solar cycle24.

    This antenna has a very short boom length for a 10M Yagi at only 7’ long. So how is this possible for a 10m Yagi to be so short?
  • Stone's Throw! By Jack L. Stone, Editor-in Chief & Publisher
    Alex Approaches!

    A monthly column covering breaking news, new concepts and products, people making news and introduction of the current month's issue articles and its authors—although not limited to this only.

FEATURE ARTICLES IN THE LIBRARY OF NEW ISSUES:

Design of a 2-3-El Full-Performance Yagi for Portable & Field Use
with No-Tool Configuration Changing
Part 3: Improving 20- and 17-Meter Performance
By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL (SK)

Parts 1 and 2 described the electrical and mechanical design of a Yagi beam for field and other portable uses. It employed a 12’ boom for high performance from 3 elements on 15, 12, and 10 meters and full 2-element performance on 17 and 20 meters. The maximum element length was 26.33’ to optimize gain and front-to-back ratio on each band. The beam required no matching section, but connected directly to a 50-Ω coaxial cable with 1.6:1 SWR or better.

When using 3 elements, the beam provided a free-space forward gain value of between 6.7 and 7.2 dBi, with a front-to-back ratio of about 20 dB. In contrast, when using only 2 elements (on 17 and 20 meters), the gain dropped to about 6 dBi, with a front-to-back ratio barely over 10 dB. One residual question left by the discussion is whether it might be possible to increase the gain and front-to-back ratio on the lower bands to values more in keeping with those obtained on 15 through 10 meters. Of course, the maximum boom length must remain 12’, and the feedpoint must not require a matching section or network to arrive at a 50-Ω impedance. As well, the individual elements must retain the structure assigned to them in the first two parts of these notes.

Practical Antennas: Part 2.9
By Marcel H. De Canck, ON5AU

The ionosphere plays a tricky but an important role to our radio communications, and there is very little we can do about it. But there is plenty you can do about having a good and efficient antenna system. Yes, antenna system, it’s not the antenna itself but the whole part as transmission line, and matching properly the transceiver and the antenna to the transmission line. It is a breath-taking concept that a simple length of wire or rod or tube can transform electrical energy into invisible radio electro-magnetic waves that can cross the space at the speed of light.

How does an antenna system works? Why does the antenna radiate electro-magnetic waves? These questions I heard many times and the answers are not given with few words. Never-the-less, many books and some of great weight and complexity have been written about antennas and many antenna types have been developed and build. Often it is not comprehensive to the layman to fully understand the whys and hows of the radiation capabilities of an antenna and these counts even for the simplest ones like a dipole or a groundplane. Also I often hear many times misconceptions about antenna properties and characteristics. To start with, understanding why and how a simple antenna effective radiates will be explained in a clear view. The dipole is the best antenna to do that and once the secrets of the dipole characteristics and properties are fully understood it will be much easier to have a clear insight of the hows and whys of more complicated antennas.

The first episodes will handle completely about antenna fundamentals mostly with the half wavelength dipole as study example. The dipole is also often a part element of more complicated antennas such as a Yagi and others. In particular for the low frequency bands, the dipole is used by many radio amateurs as transmitting or receiving antenna and its many practical installations and shapes will be fully studied and explained in a chapter later on. In fact many other antenna types will become subject to explanation as the antenna story develops.

NewcomerNotes: Monitoring and Scanning Antennas
By Robert Gulley, AK3Q

There’s nothing I like more in radio than snagging an elusive signal miles and miles away regardless of the band; to my way of thinking, that’s a night well-spent! But, sometimes I really enjoy listening to things much closer to home and finding out what is going on in my own back yard is extremely rewarding. I am talking about police and emergency scanning of course, and it is something I have enjoyed off and on since I was about 12 years old. Scanning (or monitoring) as I will be using the term here includes police, fire, coast guard, aviation, public utilities, sports stadiums, business, and even things such as towing services and taxicabs. Anything which broadcasts in the clear is fair game for listening, and you might be amazed at what you’ll hear if you have never given a listen before.

Inverted L for HF
by
Owen Duffy, VK1OD

This article describes a simple Inverted L for the HF bands. The priority requirements were a single antenna system that is unobtrusive and compatible with the Icom AH-4 tuner, reasonable performance on 80m, 40m, and 30m bands and frequency agility.

To achieve reasonable performance down to 80m, the wire needs to be longer than about 35% of a wavelength or 30m. A suitable pair of supports which could accommodate about 27m of wire were identified. With 27m as a starting point, NEC models were created for an Inverted L with a 7.7m vertical section to a suitable anchor point on the mast, and 19m in the horizontal top leg.

The model was examined for reasonable performance down to 80m, and avoidance of high driving impedances in any amateur bands. Although this configuration was fine for the existing HF bands, it resulted in a very high driving voltage in the 5.0 to 5.5MHz region. In the hope that we may get some channels in this area, the top section was reduced to 17.5m to shift the first parallel resonance up to about 6MHz.

The antenna was then constructed and resonances checked against the model for model verification/calibration, and a bulk loss resistance was added to the model to calibrate model results to measured load impedance at the first series resonance.

The New XY-pole Antenna - Part 2
By Edward J. Shortridge, W4JOQ

Part 2 is a continuation of the previous article XY-pole Part 1 (pronounced Zi-pole). Although the previous article presented inexpensive and easy-to-build vertical and horizontal wire antennas, this article will deal mostly with horizontal versions covering the 75-meter amateur radio phone-band from 3.65 to 4.0 MHz

As explained in the previous article, the J-pole antenna is a very narrow-band antenna and is not well-suited to cover even a small portion of the 75-meter band. This article presents the progression from a narrow-band J-pole, to the much broader X-pole antenna, which can cover the entire 75-meter band with a very low SWR. The X-pole utilizes a small capacitor between the quarter-wave matching section, and the end of the radiator, in order to achieve greater bandwidth.

The XY-pole antenna was developed to eliminate the need for a discrete capacitor component and instead uses an overlap of wires from the radiator and the quarter-wavelength matching section to create the same amount of capacitance that might have been used in the X-pole antenna. Using overlapping wires, the XY-pole antenna produces the same SWR bandwidth as the X-pole antenna
.

Radial System Design & Efficiency In HF Verticals
By Rudy Severns, N6LF

The efficiency of an HF vertical depends on its associated ground system and the soil over which the antenna is erected. The most direct way to determine the efficiency of an antenna is to determine the fraction of the input power which is actually radiated. However, there is a small complication, what do we mean by "radiated power" and how might we determine it? It turns out that there are a couple of ways to define radiated power depending on what we're using the antenna for. One practical way to address this question is to use NEC modeling which can provide the actual radiated power and that's where the information in this note was derived from. Modeling results are discussed below but details of the modeling itself are given in this article.

A related efficiency question is the long standing "conventional wisdom" that shorter radials work better with shorter verticals. It can be argued that because shorter verticals have significantly higher field intensities close to the base of the antenna (for a given input power), which leads to higher ground losses, that it makes sense that more attention be given to the radial system close in. While this sounds reasonable I couldn't find any quantitative justification. So I extended the modeling study to include shorter antennas to see if the conventional wisdom had any quantitative basis
.
 

For paid subscriber access go to the login page:
http://www.antennex.com/premium.html

...and select Library of New Issues from the top section #1.

Non-subscriber access, go to the Guest Rooms (fresh articles there too):
http://www.antennex.com/guests.html

For the premium articles, be sure you have a current subscription and don't miss this new issue. It's in your best interest to know these things.

To subscribe to premium feature articles:
http://www.antennex.com/signup.htm

For Login help:
http://www.antennex.com/help/need_help.html

Join the Mail List & Discussion Forum

Do you have a question?


Hope you enjoy the new issue!

Jack L. Stone, Publisher
antenneX Online Magazine
http://www.antennex.com
jack@antennex.com


~ BE SURE TO VISIT THE SHOPPING SHACK ~
Shipments worldwide ~ plus instant downloads
| Subscription | Books | Software | Antennas | Components |