Folks: The new antenneX
online issue #153 for the month of January 2010 is ready to read at your pleasure!
IN THIS ISSUE
We again include many fine articles by our global writing team. Now, please allow
me to introduce this month's line-up of content:
OUR MONTHLY COLUMNS:
- Antenna
Modeling By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL
(A Posthumous Publication)
Modeling
Radiating Surfaces The notes in this exercise derive from my attempts
to determine if it is possible to model with reasonable accuracy the results
obtain by an experimental exercise conducted in 1952 by two RCA researchers,
George H. Brown and O. M. Woodward, Jr. Among their numerous contributions
to the development of VHF and UHF antennas, including the emergent
television antenna industry, was an experimental characterization of conical
and triangular antennas. (See "Experimentally Determined Radiation
Characteristics of Conical and Triangular Antennas," RCA Review, Dec., 1952,
pp, 425-452.) The work eventuated in the widespread use of solid-surface fan
dipoles in TV antennas, especially for the new UHF channels from about 480
to 920 MHz. It even resulted in the bent bow-tie dipole used in
corner-reflector TV antennas. I had some limited success in capturing in NEC
models some, but by no means all, of the capabilities of the corner
reflector with a bent bow-tie in Planar and Corner Reflectors.
Brown and Woodward wanted to experimentally characterize the properties of
bi-conical dipoles and fan dipoles, antennas that had undergone extensive
theoretic analysis, but with what Brown and Woodward saw as "simplifying
assumptions and approximations in order to satisfy the required boundary
conditions and to reduce the mathematical difficulties." (p.425) As shown in
simplified form in Fig. 1, they reduced the dipoles to UHF solid-surface
monopoles with a very large highly conductive ground-plane surface to
simulate a perfect ground (PEC).
The practical interest in these antenna types does not involve their
1/2-wavelength impedance. Instead, it involves the impedance and radiation
properties of these antenna shapes as they approach and surpass a
1-wavelength electrical length at a given operating frequency.
-
From the Shack
By Ian D. Brown, G3TVU
Radio Mobile - What can it do for you?
Part 7 - Finding the
Best Sites with Waypoints
In the
previous parts we had looked at how to perform Polar and Combined Cartesian
coverage plots and how to use the Radio Link pane. This was followed in Part
6 where we explored the ‘Find Best Sites’ function (FBS) allowing us to
determine suitable possible locations on a map for a central station to give
radio coverage to the other member stations in a network.
A second facility which is available using the Find Best Sites function is
its ability to find the best sites to provide coverage of individual
locations defined by Waypoints.
First: We will see how to generate Waypoints on a map using the Radio Mobile
‘Object Editor’ to define and name specific location labels.
Second: Next we will see how to accurately place the waypoints by using
zoomed areas of the map and the Object Editor Delete and Insert functions.
Third: We will then apply the FBS function to the waypoints and show how to
generate plots over detailed area.
Fourth: Finally placing the moving ‘mobile’ HH unit at each waypoint
location by the use of the Object Editor, show that the FBS provides the
necessary communications paths. A confirmation signal strength plot follows.
Once again I will use my ‘BaseU’ UHF network for the description, as with my
local terrain it is much more difficult to obtain coverage into the valleys
when using UHF frequencies with low power equipment, and this shows the
capability of Radio Mobile.
-
Ham WorkShop
By
L. B. Cebik, W4RNL
(A Posthumous Publication)
Tips for Stealth Antennas
If you live in an apartment, condo, or development
with antenna restrictions, you may need to hide or disguise your antenna.
Here are some ideas to get you started. First, some general principles and
then some basic antenna types.
- Stone's Throw!
By Jack L. Stone, Editor-in Chief & Publisher
Calling CQ
A monthly column covering breaking news, new concepts and products,
people making news and introduction of the current month's issue articles and its
authorsalthough not limited to this only.
FEATURE ARTICLES IN THE LIBRARY
OF NEW ISSUES:
|
Why? Why? Why? A Basic Tri-Band Yagi
By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL (SK) |
|
The
design of multi-band HF Yagis is as much an art as a science. I have
the utmost admiration for those who design these antennas. The
following notes do not compete with their work, but might be
considered an homage to their continuing efforts to improve the
performance that we can wrest from a multi-band array. We shall
examine the design of a tri-band Yagi of very modest proportions for
20 through 10 meters with seven elements on a 13’ boom (make it 14’
to include the mounting hardware).
Why #1: I receive e-mails and letters asking why there are no such
beams currently at my web site. This set of notes is my general
answer.
Why #2: Even using the best materials available, the cost for a
knowledgeable builder will be between 1/3 to ½ the cost of a
commercial beam with the same general capabilities.
Why #3: For the newer antenna addict, looking at a tri-band design
provides a chance to see some of the challenges that go into such
designs.
The “why” terms are actually a code
name for the design, which I have designated for my own files as
YYY-TRI-15-70-MD. The file name breaks down this way. YYY means that
the beam consists of three Yagis interlaced acceptably: 2 elements
for 20, 2 elements for 15, and 3 elements for 10. |
|
Practical Antennas: Part 2.3
By
Marcel H. De Canck, ON5AU |
|
The ionosphere plays a tricky but an important
role to our radio communications, and there is very little we can do
about it. But there is plenty you can do about having a good and
efficient antenna system. Yes, antenna system, it’s not the antenna
itself but the whole part as transmission line, and matching
properly the transceiver and the antenna to the transmission line.
It is a breath-taking concept that a simple length of wire or rod or
tube can transform electrical energy into invisible radio
electro-magnetic waves that can cross the space at the speed of
light.
How does an antenna system works? Why does the antenna radiate
electro-magnetic waves? These questions I heard many times and the
answers are not given with few words. Never-the-less, many books and
some of great weight and complexity have been written about antennas
and many antenna types have been developed and build. Often it is
not comprehensive to the layman to fully understand the whys and
hows of the radiation capabilities of an antenna and these counts
even for the simplest ones like a dipole or a groundplane. Also I
often hear many times misconceptions about antenna properties and
characteristics. To start with, understanding why and how a simple
antenna effective radiates will be explained in a clear view. The
dipole is the best antenna to do that and once the secrets of the
dipole characteristics and properties are fully understood it will
be much easier to have a clear insight of the hows and whys of more
complicated antennas.
The first episodes will handle completely about antenna fundamentals
mostly with the half wavelength dipole as study example. The dipole
is also often a part element of more complicated antennas such as a
Yagi and others. In particular for the low frequency bands, the
dipole is used by many radio amateurs as transmitting or receiving
antenna and its many practical installations and shapes will be
fully studied and explained in a chapter later on. In fact many
other antenna types will become subject to explanation as the
antenna story develops. |
|
NewcomerNotes: Small Magnetic Loop
Antennas
By Robert Gulley, AK3Q |
|
While I get into the specifics of
the magnetic loop antenna, one of the best I features I found of a
small magnetic loop is the deep nulls exhibited by this type of
antenna. Strong channel interference can be minimized with a loop
antenna, as can electrical interference. This is because a small
loop antenna works primarily in the magnetic field portion of the
radio wave rather than the electrical field. Urban settings can
often be filled with electronic noise, and a small loop antenna can
null out much of the interference on a given frequency. Loop
antennas are also often used as a Radio Direction Finder (RDF)
because of their nulling capabilities. |
|
THE Moxon Beam
By Martin Steyer, DK7ZB |
|
The Moxon Beam was
introduced by L. Moxon (G6XN) in his book "HF Antennas for all
Locations" (RSGB- Publications, Great Britain 1993). This beam is a
2-Element-Yagi with radiator and reflector and reduced size to about
75% of a normal beam. The 2-Element-Yagi with reflector has normally
a 0,2-l-boom and an impedance of 50 W. The Moxon-beam has a
0,18-l-boom and still 50 W. This is good impedance for wire beams.
The ends of the two elements are bent backward (radiator) or forward
(reflector) and act as a capacitive load. That is much better than
inductive loading with coils. So we have greater bandwidth and lower
losses. Through the reduced size we get a 0,5-0,7 dB lower gain than
with a full-size beam. |
|
Multi-Band L-pole Vertical Antennas
14 to 29.7MHz Broad-Banded Antennas
By Edward J. Shortridge, W4JOQ |
|
This
"Multi-Band L-pole Vertical Antennas" article is a continuation of
my previous article, entitled "6-10-meter & 10-20-meter L-pole
Antennas, which was published in the antenneX issue No. 152 of
December 2009. This previous article gave a detailed introduction to
the "L" broadbanding method, but it only covered horizontal
antennas. This new article takes up where the other one ended and
presents a variety of vertical configurations covering the entire
frequency range from 14 to 29.7 MHz. All of the antennas presented
utilize two radiators in order to simulate a larger diameter. For
improved SWR across this band, a version is shown which uses a
lightweight triangular aluminum tower normally used for
meteorological purposes, this tower will be used as the radiating
element, and will be fed in its center. |
|
Yagi Antenna Elements Correction for
Square Boom
By Dragoslav Dobričić, YU1AW (Serbia) |
In
the previous December 2009 article we showed how the boom caused
influences on elements passing through a round tube metal boom and
also if they were not insulated from it. Investigation results,
presented in this article, will show what the difference is if we
use a square tube boom instead of round one.
We know that the presence of a conductive boom and its diameter
value have an influence on a Yagi antenna and change both the
antenna radiation pattern and input impedance. For this
investigation we used all other parameters and dimensions as in our
previous article [1] except that instead of round tube boom we used
square tube boom with dimension a = 2 br or br = a/2 where br is
boom radius of round tube boom in previous article.
Different Yagi antenna designs show different sensitivity to
environmental impacts and it is expected that an antenna boom with
different cross section shape can show different effects on
different antenna designs as well.
In this investigation we will examine how square tube metal boom
influences antenna performance when elements without insulation are
passing through it. |
|
|
For paid subscriber
access go to the login page:
http://www.antennex.com/premium.html
...and select Library of New Issues from the top section #1.
Non-subscriber access, go to the
Guest Rooms (fresh articles there too):
http://www.antennex.com/guests.html
For the premium articles, be sure you have a current subscription and don't miss this new issue.
It's in your best interest to know these things.
To subscribe to premium feature articles:
http://www.antennex.com/signup.htm
For Login help:
http://www.antennex.com/help/need_help.html
Join the Mail List
& Discussion Forum
Do
you have a question?
Hope you enjoy the new issue!
Jack L. Stone, Publisher
antenneX Online Magazine
http://www.antennex.com
jack@antennex.com
~ BE SURE TO VISIT THE SHOPPING SHACK ~
Shipments worldwide ~ plus instant downloads
| Subscription | Books | Software | Antennas | Components | |