Folks: The new antenneX
online issue #152 for the month of December 2009 is ready to read at your pleasure!
IN THIS ISSUE
We again include many fine articles by our global writing team. Now, please allow
me to introduce this month's line-up of content:
OUR MONTHLY COLUMNS:
- Antenna
Modeling By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL
(A Posthumous Publication)
VOACAP Type 13 Files
What is a type-13 file? Like modeling cores, such as NEC and
MININEC, propagation software has one or two primary calculation cores with
embellished implementing software. The older core is IONCAP, although the
most commonly used package is VOACAP. In 1985, the Voice of America (VOA)
adopted the Ionospheric Communications Analysis and Prediction Program
(IONCAP) as the approved engineering model to be used for broadcast relay
station design and antenna specification. As the program was modified for
these purposes, the name was changed to the Voice of America Coverage
Analysis Program (VOACAP) to distinguish it from the official National
Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) IONCAP program. The
Fortran code for VOACAP is readily available, allowing a number of
implementations, such as ACE-HF, available from antenneX.
-
From the Shack
By Ian D. Brown, G3TVU
Radio Mobile - What can it do for you?
Part 6 - Finding the
Best Sites
In the
previous parts we first saw an overview of the program features followed by
a description of how to start using the Radio Mobile program. Next we saw
how to move and resize maps, generate suitable canvases for plots and then
perform Polar and Combined Cartesian radio coverage plots. Following this
was a detailed description of the Radio Link pane and its features, showing
how it can be utilised to explore changes in Radio unit characteristics to
gain improvements in individual radio link performances.
The next feature to be explored is the ‘Find Best Sites’ (FBS) function.
This enables suitable locations to be discovered for a central base station
to provide communications to a number of other designated stations within a
network.
First: We will see how to obtain plots which give an indication of locations
on a map which are suitable to provide coverage to a percentage of other
member stations in a Network.
Second: Next we will explore the plots produced including saved individual
unit plot files, and then check the results for conformity.
Third: Finally we will look at how to zoom into areas of interest, and then
by using selected area plots discover suitable locations where we can place
the central station on the ground. Export of a picture as an overlay into
Google Earth is also described, and the import of Placemarks from Google
Earth as new Unit locations shown.
-
Ham WorkShop
By Martin Steyer, DK7ZB
The DK7ZB-Reflector-Hentenna
The original Hentenna as a special kind of a
single loop was described first in the 1970s by Japanese Hams, an English
article by JF6DEA/KE1EO about the Antenna ("The Hentenna – The Japanese
'Miracle' Wire") was in the QST 1982 and in the ARRL-Antenna- Compendium,
Vol. 5. The basic function of the Hentenna structure is the
1,50-λ-Extended-Quad. This antenna with the figure of an "Oblong" has a gain
of 3,6 dBd, but a feedpoint impedance of 73 + j 470 Ω. The Hentenna has
nearly the same gain, but a clever feeding with an impedance at XX of 50-70
+/- j 0 Ω.
- Stone's Throw!
By Jack L. Stone, Publisher
When Wires Become Antennas
A monthly column covering breaking news, new concepts and products,
people making news and introduction of the current month's issue articles and its
authorsalthough not limited to this only.
FEATURE ARTICLES IN THE LIBRARY
OF NEW ISSUES:
|
MYY-TRI
By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL (SK) |
|
“MYY-Tri” stands for a Moxon rectangle-Yagi-Yagi tri-band array for
20, 15, and 10 meters. We may pronounce the label as “My Try.” In
effect, the antenna that we shall examine in these notes is a design
exercise aimed at seeing if I could apply some of the principles
recorded and illustrated in the 6-part series, “Designing Multi-Band
Parasitic Beams” to a 3-band array. The series focused on 2-band
beams in order to keep the principles as clear as circumstances
permitted. However, most amateurs wish to cover at least three bands
with their directional arrays. So I started working on a tri-band
beam using a Moxon rectangle for 20 meters, with linear Yagi
elements for the two upper bands. The result turned out to be two
designs rather than just one, and there are at least 5 notable
variations in all. |
|
Practical Antennas: Part 2.2
By
Marcel H. De Canck, ON5AU |
|
The ionosphere plays a tricky but an important
role to our radio communications, and there is very little we can do
about it. But there is plenty you can do about having a good and
efficient antenna system. Yes, antenna system, it’s not the antenna
itself but the whole part as transmission line, and matching
properly the transceiver and the antenna to the transmission line.
It is a breath-taking concept that a simple length of wire or rod or
tube can transform electrical energy into invisible radio
electro-magnetic waves that can cross the space at the speed of
light.
How does an antenna system works? Why does the antenna radiate
electro-magnetic waves? These questions I heard many times and the
answers are not given with few words. Never-the-less, many books and
some of great weight and complexity have been written about antennas
and many antenna types have been developed and build. Often it is
not comprehensive to the layman to fully understand the whys and
hows of the radiation capabilities of an antenna and these counts
even for the simplest ones like a dipole or a groundplane. Also I
often hear many times misconceptions about antenna properties and
characteristics. To start with, understanding why and how a simple
antenna effective radiates will be explained in a clear view. The
dipole is the best antenna to do that and once the secrets of the
dipole characteristics and properties are fully understood it will
be much easier to have a clear insight of the hows and whys of more
complicated antennas.
The first episodes will handle completely about antenna fundamentals
mostly with the half wavelength dipole as study example. The dipole
is also often a part element of more complicated antennas such as a
Yagi and others. In particular for the low frequency bands, the
dipole is used by many radio amateurs as transmitting or receiving
antenna and its many practical installations and shapes will be
fully studied and explained in a chapter later on. In fact many
other antenna types will become subject to explanation as the
antenna story develops. |
|
NewcomerNotes: Antenna Efficiency,
Bandwidth and Gain
By Robert Gulley, AK3Q |
For those who are new to radio
antennas in general, and especially for those who want to use an
Amateur Radio station, antenna efficiency is an important yet often
misunderstood concept.
Bandwidth is another one of those often misunderstood terms
frequently used when discussing antenna specifications. Maybe the
concept is obvious to most, but for me, I was a bit confused when I
started out because I thought bandwidth referred to which bands (or
the number of bands) with which the antenna was designed to work.
What bandwidth actually refers to is how much of a given band will
be reasonably covered by an antenna, and of course these figures
will be somewhat subjective since every station setup is different.
Antenna gain is a much misunderstood term because true gain only
really occurs when power is added to a signal through some means,
such as with an “Active” antenna. All gain figures are
comparative — one antenna is compared to another, usually in
theoretical terms.
All of the above
factors are discussed in depth in this month's article. |
|
THE OCF FD4 (FD3) WINDOM ANTENNA
By Frits HV Geerligs, PA0FRI |
|
The 4-band
(10-20-40-80) Fritzel model FD4 is a special version of a Windom
antenna. It is a half-wave long on the lowest frequency, and is fed
from a coax cable through a transformer inserted in the wire at
one-third from one end. It so happened I was experimenting with the
same system of antenna and trying to determine the best dimensions.
We also discuss a 5-band version of the FD4 or 80-40-20-15-10.
Another version can handle 160. The Fritzel FD3 is a half-size
version of the FD4, which resonates on 40, 20 and 10-m. 15-m, can be
added as described in this article. |
|
6-10M & 10-20M L-pole Antennas
Broad Banding and Creating Dual-Band Antennas
By Edward J. Shortridge, W4JOQ |
|
The
broad banding of antennas using "L" pads consisting of a series
inductance with a shunt capacitance have been used in various forms
for many years. They have been modified to substitute coaxial cables
for any discrete components, and their use can be found in many
types of antennas.
In the latter part of the year 2000, I began modeling using "L"
pads, but the basic pad was insufficient to control the shape of the
SWR across the entire bandwidth being considered. Therefore, I
modified the configuration to include a series matching line on the
input, and included a discrete inductor paralleling the shunt
capacitor. |
|
Yagi Antenna Elements Boom Correction
By Dragoslav Dobričić, YU1AW (Serbia) |
The boom of Yagi antenna is inevitable
part of its construction. Theoretically, Yagi antenna can work fine
without a boom. Practically, that is possible only if boom is made
of non-conducting material (wood, fiberglass, etc.). A conducting
boom is not intended radiating part of antenna but only an
inevitable part of its support construction.
The Yagi antenna can be built in few ways. It can be built so that
elements are insulated and separated by some safe distance from any
conducting boom. Another way is to build antenna so that elements
pass through boom. This method can be done in two different ways:
first, elements electrically bonded to boom, and second, elements
electrically insulated from boom. All of these elements mounting
methods have their advantages and disadvantages and different boom
influence to antenna elements.
So far, in several previous articles we have investigated how boom
radius and its distance from antenna elements influences performance
of six different 2 m Yagi antennas which are very similar in all
characteristics except in Q factor values. In these articles we show
how this unnecessary but inevitable “intruder” influences Yagi
antenna performances when elements are insulated and separated by
various distance from conducting boom.
How did boom influence on the elements that are passing through a
boom and they are not insulated from it? This is the question which
we will try to answer with this investigation which results are
presented in this article. |
|
|
For paid subscriber
access go to the login page:
http://www.antennex.com/premium.html
...and select Library of New Issues from the top section #1.
Non-subscriber access, go to the
Guest Rooms (fresh articles there too):
http://www.antennex.com/guests.html
For the premium articles, be sure you have a current subscription and don't miss this new issue.
It's in your best interest to know these things.
To subscribe to premium feature articles:
http://www.antennex.com/signup.htm
For Login help:
http://www.antennex.com/help/need_help.html
Join the Mail List
& Discussion Forum
Do
you have a question?
Hope you enjoy the new issue!
Jack L. Stone, Publisher
antenneX Online Magazine
http://www.antennex.com
jack@antennex.com
~ BE SURE TO VISIT THE SHOPPING SHACK ~
Shipments worldwide ~ plus instant downloads
| Subscription | Books | Software | Antennas | Components | |