jack.gif (2793 bytes)
Jack L. Stone
Publisher

arrows_ORANGE_left.gif (577 bytes) December 2009 arrows_ORANGE_right.gif (593 bytes)
New Issue of antenneX for December 2009 is Published!

Join the Mail List & Discussion Forum
See Links of Importance at Bottom Too!
Do you have a question?


L.B. Cebik, W4RNL(SK)
But Active Contributor


Folks: The new antenneX online issue #152 for the month of December 2009 is ready to read at your pleasure!

IN THIS ISSUE
We again include many fine articles by our global writing team. Now, please allow me to introduce this month's line-up of content:


OUR MONTHLY COLUMNS:

  • Antenna Modeling By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL (A Posthumous Publication)
    VOACAP Type 13 Files

    What is a type-13 file? Like modeling cores, such as NEC and MININEC, propagation software has one or two primary calculation cores with embellished implementing software. The older core is IONCAP, although the most commonly used package is VOACAP. In 1985, the Voice of America (VOA) adopted the Ionospheric Communications Analysis and Prediction Program (IONCAP) as the approved engineering model to be used for broadcast relay station design and antenna specification. As the program was modified for these purposes, the name was changed to the Voice of America Coverage Analysis Program (VOACAP) to distinguish it from the official National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) IONCAP program. The Fortran code for VOACAP is readily available, allowing a number of implementations, such as ACE-HF, available from antenneX.

     
  • From the Shack By Ian D. Brown, G3TVU
    Radio Mobile - What can it do for you?
    Part 6 -
    Finding the Best Sites
    In the previous parts we first saw an overview of the program features followed by a description of how to start using the Radio Mobile program. Next we saw how to move and resize maps, generate suitable canvases for plots and then perform Polar and Combined Cartesian radio coverage plots. Following this was a detailed description of the Radio Link pane and its features, showing how it can be utilised to explore changes in Radio unit characteristics to gain improvements in individual radio link performances.

    The next feature to be explored is the ‘Find Best Sites’ (FBS) function. This enables suitable locations to be discovered for a central base station to provide communications to a number of other designated stations within a network.

    First: We will see how to obtain plots which give an indication of locations on a map which are suitable to provide coverage to a percentage of other member stations in a Network.

    Second: Next we will explore the plots produced including saved individual unit plot files, and then check the results for conformity.

    Third: Finally we will look at how to zoom into areas of interest, and then by using selected area plots discover suitable locations where we can place the central station on the ground. Export of a picture as an overlay into Google Earth is also described, and the import of Placemarks from Google Earth as new Unit locations shown.
     
  • Ham WorkShop By Martin Steyer, DK7ZB
    The DK7ZB-Reflector-Hentenna
    The original Hentenna as a special kind of a single loop was described first in the 1970s by Japanese Hams, an English article by JF6DEA/KE1EO about the Antenna ("The Hentenna – The Japanese 'Miracle' Wire") was in the QST 1982 and in the ARRL-Antenna- Compendium, Vol. 5. The basic function of the Hentenna structure is the 1,50-λ-Extended-Quad. This antenna with the figure of an "Oblong" has a gain of 3,6 dBd, but a feedpoint impedance of 73 + j 470 Ω. The Hentenna has nearly the same gain, but a clever feeding with an impedance at XX of 50-70 +/- j 0 Ω.
  • Stone's Throw! By Jack L. Stone, Publisher
    When Wires Become Antennas

    A monthly column covering breaking news, new concepts and products, people making news and introduction of the current month's issue articles and its authors—although not limited to this only.

FEATURE ARTICLES IN THE LIBRARY OF NEW ISSUES:

MYY-TRI
By L. B. Cebik, W4RNL (SK)

“MYY-Tri” stands for a Moxon rectangle-Yagi-Yagi tri-band array for 20, 15, and 10 meters. We may pronounce the label as “My Try.” In effect, the antenna that we shall examine in these notes is a design exercise aimed at seeing if I could apply some of the principles recorded and illustrated in the 6-part series, “Designing Multi-Band Parasitic Beams” to a 3-band array. The series focused on 2-band beams in order to keep the principles as clear as circumstances permitted. However, most amateurs wish to cover at least three bands with their directional arrays. So I started working on a tri-band beam using a Moxon rectangle for 20 meters, with linear Yagi elements for the two upper bands. The result turned out to be two designs rather than just one, and there are at least 5 notable variations in all.

Practical Antennas: Part 2.2
By Marcel H. De Canck, ON5AU

The ionosphere plays a tricky but an important role to our radio communications, and there is very little we can do about it. But there is plenty you can do about having a good and efficient antenna system. Yes, antenna system, it’s not the antenna itself but the whole part as transmission line, and matching properly the transceiver and the antenna to the transmission line. It is a breath-taking concept that a simple length of wire or rod or tube can transform electrical energy into invisible radio electro-magnetic waves that can cross the space at the speed of light.

How does an antenna system works? Why does the antenna radiate electro-magnetic waves? These questions I heard many times and the answers are not given with few words. Never-the-less, many books and some of great weight and complexity have been written about antennas and many antenna types have been developed and build. Often it is not comprehensive to the layman to fully understand the whys and hows of the radiation capabilities of an antenna and these counts even for the simplest ones like a dipole or a groundplane. Also I often hear many times misconceptions about antenna properties and characteristics. To start with, understanding why and how a simple antenna effective radiates will be explained in a clear view. The dipole is the best antenna to do that and once the secrets of the dipole characteristics and properties are fully understood it will be much easier to have a clear insight of the hows and whys of more complicated antennas.

The first episodes will handle completely about antenna fundamentals mostly with the half wavelength dipole as study example. The dipole is also often a part element of more complicated antennas such as a Yagi and others. In particular for the low frequency bands, the dipole is used by many radio amateurs as transmitting or receiving antenna and its many practical installations and shapes will be fully studied and explained in a chapter later on. In fact many other antenna types will become subject to explanation as the antenna story develops.

NewcomerNotes: Antenna Efficiency, Bandwidth and Gain
By Robert Gulley, AK3Q

For those who are new to radio antennas in general, and especially for those who want to use an Amateur Radio station, antenna efficiency is an important yet often misunderstood concept.

Bandwidth is another one of those often misunderstood terms frequently used when discussing antenna specifications. Maybe the concept is obvious to most, but for me, I was a bit confused when I started out because I thought bandwidth referred to which bands (or the number of bands) with which the antenna was designed to work. What bandwidth actually refers to is how much of a given band will be reasonably covered by an antenna, and of course these figures will be somewhat subjective since every station setup is different.

Antenna gain is a much misunderstood term because true gain only really occurs when power is added to a signal through some means, such as with an “Active” antenna.  All gain figures are comparative — one antenna is compared to another, usually in theoretical terms.

All of the above factors are discussed in depth in this month's article.

THE OCF FD4 (FD3) WINDOM ANTENNA
By Frits HV Geerligs, PA0FRI

The 4-band (10-20-40-80) Fritzel model FD4 is a special version of a Windom antenna. It is a half-wave long on the lowest frequency, and is fed from a coax cable through a transformer inserted in the wire at one-third from one end. It so happened I was experimenting with the same system of antenna and trying to determine the best dimensions. We also discuss a 5-band version of the FD4 or 80-40-20-15-10. Another version can handle 160. The Fritzel FD3 is a half-size version of the FD4, which resonates on 40, 20 and 10-m. 15-m, can be added as described in this article.

6-10M & 10-20M L-pole Antennas
Broad Banding and Creating Dual-Band Antennas
By Edward J. Shortridge, W4JOQ

The broad banding of antennas using "L" pads consisting of a series inductance with a shunt capacitance have been used in various forms for many years. They have been modified to substitute coaxial cables for any discrete components, and their use can be found in many types of antennas.

In the latter part of the year 2000, I began modeling using "L" pads, but the basic pad was insufficient to control the shape of the SWR across the entire bandwidth being considered. Therefore, I modified the configuration to include a series matching line on the input, and included a discrete inductor paralleling the shunt capacitor.

Yagi Antenna Elements Boom Correction
By Dragoslav Dobričić, YU1AW (Serbia)

The boom of Yagi antenna is inevitable part of its construction. Theoretically, Yagi antenna can work fine without a boom. Practically, that is possible only if boom is made of non-conducting material (wood, fiberglass, etc.). A conducting boom is not intended radiating part of antenna but only an inevitable part of its support construction.

The Yagi antenna can be built in few ways. It can be built so that elements are insulated and separated by some safe distance from any conducting boom. Another way is to build antenna so that elements pass through boom. This method can be done in two different ways: first, elements electrically bonded to boom, and second, elements electrically insulated from boom. All of these elements mounting methods have their advantages and disadvantages and different boom influence to antenna elements.

So far, in several previous articles we have investigated how boom radius and its distance from antenna elements influences performance of six different 2 m Yagi antennas which are very similar in all characteristics except in Q factor values. In these articles we show how this unnecessary but inevitable “intruder” influences Yagi antenna performances when elements are insulated and separated by various distance from conducting boom.

How did boom influence on the elements that are passing through a boom and they are not insulated from it? This is the question which we will try to answer with this investigation which results are presented in this article.
 

For paid subscriber access go to the login page:
http://www.antennex.com/premium.html

...and select Library of New Issues from the top section #1.

Non-subscriber access, go to the Guest Rooms (fresh articles there too):
http://www.antennex.com/guests.html

For the premium articles, be sure you have a current subscription and don't miss this new issue. It's in your best interest to know these things.

To subscribe to premium feature articles:
http://www.antennex.com/signup.htm

For Login help:
http://www.antennex.com/help/need_help.html

Join the Mail List & Discussion Forum

Do you have a question?


Hope you enjoy the new issue!

Jack L. Stone, Publisher
antenneX Online Magazine
http://www.antennex.com
jack@antennex.com


~ BE SURE TO VISIT THE SHOPPING SHACK ~
Shipments worldwide ~ plus instant downloads
| Subscription | Books | Software | Antennas | Components |