[ Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: David Jefferies
Date: 19 Apr 2003
Time: 13:24:37
Remote Name: 195.92.168.169
Dear Mr X,<><><> Thanks for that. I had seen that circuit diagram some years ago. I just wanted an update consistingof some more recent information, as I understand that no-one has yet demonstrated that this object works as advertised, that is, with good efficiency and reasonable generated signal strengths, in accord with the suggested theory on the web page, and not as merely a squat fat monopole. Certainly, the one I went to see in Shropshire did not work as advertised, despite much time and money having been investment by the firm to whom this technology had been suggested. Now, PLEASE can Maurice Hately now tell us why this old circuit does not, apparently, work as he stated, and what does he think should be done to reproduce his results. I, and many others, should like to see a working demonstration, as this would have much commercial possibility for exploitation, and be of great interest to the theorists. There is no doubt that antennas of this kind can be made to sort-of communicate, but only at what the professionals call "unacceptable levels of efficiency for commercial purposes". Thanks very much. Best regards, <><><> David Jefferies.