[ Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Stefano IK5IIR
Date: 15 Apr 2003
Time: 16:47:36
Remote Name: 80.116.253.207
Hi Alan, ok just for clarity.... on a previous post you said :...and you also have to provide an alternative electromagnetic theory that is not based on the physics of Faraday and Maxwell and others, that shows how the antenna works . . . 73s, Alan .........well we say to use the Poynting theorem is a still valid theorem as we all know. In the our new application the fields are generated following the well known Maxwell laws...hence also those are valid.Alan is just a new application of the well known laws. so why we are claiming to get an high real (no Rloss) Rrad?Because when the two E and H fields are interacting each other with the proper phasing(new application)happens the Rrad increase.Is the same claim present in the CFA or CFL.Using your alternative method to calculate the EH efficiency we proved the antenna is efficient. I hink this should be a stimulus to investigate more on these new antennas.We are screaming this from years.Inventions happen sometimes , we know it.As Hately wrote many times , any person can achieve excellent results with the CFL . Excellent results means NOT only QSOs but real , practical evidence , measures ,showing is something new .In fact many hams built one of it (so did I) and found he was right. It needs no more than 2 houres of fun....On the Antennex archive , for instance, there is a very good practical article on it.OK Alan I hope to have clarified ( may be not..hi..)all. 73's Stefano IK5IIR