st_hdr.jpg (25242 bytes)The New Cube-C Antenna Arrives!
By Jack L. Stone, Publisher

stone_a.gif (1332 bytes)s I had mentioned in previous columns of recent months, a very interesting new antenna device was in the works and we would be writing about it as soon as it was tested. That time has finally arrived and perhaps we have something special here.

We were aware of this project in progress by the developers for an efficient compact based on conventional science. Several of our independent antenna experts have been observing the developments and based on their belief that this one has very high promise, I am also encouraged enough to announce it to our readers in 185 countries.

In this month’s issue of antenneX we reveal this new design for a compact antenna developed jointly by Dan Handelsman, N2DT (USA) and Claudio Re, I1RFQ (Italy). It is one of three compacts developed by this team and is a “Compact Cube” or “Cube-C” as I believe it will be called. This first of three new compact antennas by these co-developers is protected by the Patent Office therefore allowing us to publicize the design.

Just how compact is it? As shown by the front cover this month, 50cmX50cmX50cm for 40 meters isn't bad! Doing the quick conversion, that's about 20 inches per side! Small enough to carry through the doorway and up the stairs.

It is encouraging to hear that it is not based on any exotic theory or hype, but proven antenna techniques. Most importantly, the design was not to be released until it had been extensively tested and proven to perform as predicted. Depending on the size and frequency of use, the gain is claimed to be anywhere from 5 to 20 dB higher than a compact loop's according to the co-developers.

It certainly looks like a good compact prospect and material for experimenting. A number of experiments are already under way and I hope we’ll hear about them. Our series of articles about these new “Cube-type” antennas begin this month and will continue over the next several months. There will be plenty of details provided about performance and how to construct one for the band(s) of choice.


AN INVITATION TO CONTRIBUTORS
writing.gif (12363 bytes)antenneX thrives on the contributions of antenna experimenters, ranging from the informal home shop construction project to the theoretical investigation of basic antenna, feedline, and propagation phenomena. Over the years, we have published articles on the use of new or newly adapted materials, known antennas adapted to new circumstances, modifications of antenna structures, basic explorations of both common and unusual antennas, antenna modeling exercises, design improvements, antenna matching techniques from both a physical and mathematical perspective, evaluations of mini-antennas and their underlying theory of operation, new and patentable designs, propagation tutorials, and.... The list goes onward, since no antenna-related topic is irrelevant to the readers of antenneX.

At the same time, antenneX has experienced continuous growth in its readership—for which we are appreciative. We must be doing something right. However, all readers can help us do even better. How? By submitting an article every now and then based on your current antenna work that may be useful at any level to other readers.

Among the engineering and researching readers, there are undoubtedly a number of unclassified and non-proprietary findings that antenneX readers would like to know. Among the practical antenna designers, there are ideas, tests, and numerous other practical findings to benefit our readers. Antenna builders very likely have some techniques to share with other readers. Besides the regular articles, we always have the home work shop column for shorter practical ideas and we always have the invited news and editorial column for information about new technologies, future advances, lost old but good ideas, and personal reasoned views on the good to bad things that are happening in the world of antennas and propagation.

If you are uncertain about whether your ideas merit an article, please feel free to send an outline to the general editor/publishers at
submissions@antennex.com . Do not feel that you must be ready to be a regular submitter to write for antenneX, because we welcome the individual contribution as much as monthly articles. As well, do not believe that the slots in each issue are already spoken for—we shall always make room for a worthy article.

To see details of our writing guidelines, please look at: Writing for antenneX


ANTENNA DISCUSSION LIST
subscribe.jpg (18601 bytes)Since the new antenna-discussion list was established by antenneX a couple of months ago, it has grown to more than 330 subscribers.

It is also a pleasure to see the variety of subjects covered from theory, involving high math, to modeling, to antenna components, to projects under way and new concepts being introduced. Indeed, the list is a great “watering hole” to get questions answered expertly and to exchange ideas.

The list is so successful that the Forums have been very quiet as a result. It appears that most prefer the new list method of communicating. As a consequence, we expect to cap off the Forums and use the new list format entirely. However, there is an incredible amount of valuable information that has been accumulated by the 26 Forums over the years since early 1997. There are thousands of posts there for the reading. A very fast Search function is available for quick location of a list of links to the messages that contain a keyword of interest.

Thus, we intend to continue to make the Forum postings available for read-only and focus on building the new antenna-discussion list for new active exchanges. We hope you will make use of the facilities provided and enjoy the new services.

EASIER TO SUBSCRIBE TOO
The standard “out of the box” Majordomo mail list program that we use can be difficult when a an open+confirm policy is used and a random key must be sent back to confirm the subscription. The confirmation method is utilized primarily to help discourage spammers trying to harvest the email addresses on mail lists. Like everyone else, the spammer must send back a valid email address before the subscription is complete and access is given to the list. Of course a valid email address means they could be identified.

Within the past few days, a “patch” was located that modifies the program and this patch now provides more robust handling for open+confirm un/subscription policies. The patch also fixes a bug for closed unsubscribe_policy. It adds a new address for Majordomo for handling subscription confirmations. When a user requests a subscription, they are sent a message with a randomly generated key in the subject and the body explaining the confirmation process and telling them what address made the request. To confirm, they just have to hit reply and launch off the message. Other messages to the confirmation address will be bounced back with instructions for contacting the proper address.

This should be more secure than the old auth cookie method and easier for users. It also makes administration simpler by not requiring additional owner approval for open lists when address_a subscribes address_b (confirmation makes this redundant).

AOL NOT A PROBLEM EITHER
aol.jpg (1397 bytes)Mail lists of this type usually prefer that all messages contain plain text. AOL Version 5.0 and before allowed the user to send messages using plain text. Version 6.0 allows plain text, but with a difficult series of commands the user must invoke with each message. Otherwise, all V6.0 messages default to HTML. Then, the first release of AOL V7.0 was a big relief, as it defaulted to plain text while allowing the user to select other modes. In late 2001 that changed and AOL disabled the plain text feature in AOL V7.0 and apparently didn't tell anyone. AOL 7.0, as distributed in 2002, will only allow email to be sent using HTML; plain text is no longer an option if email is composed in AOL 7.0.

HTML is unwelcome on majordomo mailing lists, especially those mailing lists that provide a digest version. It is also discouraged on most Usenet newsgroups. HTML belongs on web pages such as this; HTML is fine for private mail (between consenting parties) and HTML is acceptable on many web-based discussion boards. But not on most mailing lists.

What does AOL actually send?
When AOL 7.0 sends a message in HTML, it sends it in "multipart/alternative", or in other words, it sends the message twice. AOL sends the message once in HTML, with all the imbedded control characters ("tags"), and once in what AOL calls "text/plain". The "text/plain" copy of the message is usually not displayed to the reader, but viewing the "source" of the message will confirm its inclusion in addition to the HTML version. Unfortunately, the AOL mail program does not include appropriate formatting in the "text/plain" copy, so any columns, indents and special treatments are ignored. As a result, the "text/plain" version is often difficult to read. In addition, these dual-part messages are more than twice as large as they would have been had they ONLY been sent in plain text, in the manner of the original "Plain Text AOL 7.0" version. So, what do we do?

What is MIME?
Acronym for Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions. A standard that extends the SMTP protocol to permit data, such as video, sound, and binary files, to be transmitted by Internet e-mail without having to be translated into ASCII format first. This is accomplished by the use of MIME types, which describe the contents of a document. A MIME-compliant application sending a file, such as some e-mail programs, assigns a MIME type to the file. The receiving application, which must also be MIME-compliant, refers to a standardized list of documents that are organized into MIME types and subtypes to interpret the content of the file. For instance, one MIME type is text, and it has a number of subtypes, including plain and html. A MIME type of text/html refers to a file that contains text written in HTML. MIME is part of HTTP, and both Web browsers and HTTP servers use MIME to interpret e-mail files they send and receive.

WE USE DEMIME!
Demime, and other similar utilities, sanitize messages sent to mailing lists, removing "MIME" content such the HTML sent by the latest AOL 7.0. Demime corrects the problem of extra unreadable text from HTML messages being included in the digest version of mailing lists, and demime reduces the size of the messages that would otherwise be sent to all of the mailing list subscribers. When demime receives a multi-part mime email from an AOL sender, it discards the HTML version of the message and forwards only the "text/plain" version to the mailing list. As the AOL mail program does not include appropriate formatting in the "text/plain" copy, mailing list subscribers object to their messages being "changed" by the mailing list; when the mailing list is, in fact, accurately repeating the poorly formatted "text/plain" version of their HTML message that the sender otherwise would never see.

If you haven’t already joined, you are invited and encouraged to do so. Just click here and follow the instructions on how to join and have fun with the rest of us. If you don't participate—it's a big opportunity lost!

====================================
Antenna Discussion Mail List
JOIN NOW – Click Here
====================================


ONE MORE COUNTRY JOINED LAST MONTH!
Country number 185 just joined the listing of "Where in the World is antenneX?" As is our custom, we welcome the latest newcomers and try to tell a little about the countries, some of the history and any other things our research discovers that might be of interest. The US CIA's World Factbook is most helpful in this research. A warm welcome to these latest newcomers!


WELCOME ZAMBIA, COUNTRY #185
map.jpg (25879 bytes)The territory of Northern Rhodesia was administered by the South Africa Company from 1891 until it was taken over by the UK in 1923. During the 1920s and 1930s, advances in mining spurred development and immigration. The name was changed to Zambia upon independence in 1964.

Air pollution and resulting acid rain in the mineral extraction and refining region; chemical runoff into watersheds; poaching seriously threatens rhinoceros, elephant, antelope, and large cat populations; deforestation; soil erosion; desertification; lack of adequate water treatment presents human health risks.

The population is estimated to be just fewer than 10 million. Estimates for this country explicitly take into account the effects of excess mortality due to AIDS; this can result in lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality and death rates, lower population and growth rates, and changes in the distribution of population by age and sex than would otherwise be expected. Life expectancy is at about 37 years for both sexes.

Despite progress in privatization and budgetary reform, Zambia's economy has a long way to go. Privatization of government-owned copper mines relieved the government from covering mammoth losses generated by the industry and greatly improved the chances for copper mining to return to profitability and spur economic growth. However, low mineral prices have slowed the benefits from privatizing the mines and reduced incentives for further private investment in the sector. In late 2000, Zambia was determined to be eligible for debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative, but Zambia has not yet finalized its Poverty Reduction Strategy paper. Unemployment rates averaging 50% remain high, but GDP growth should continue at about 4%. Inflation should remain close to a whopping 20%.

COMMUNICATIONS
Telephones - main lines in use: 130,000 (including more than 40,000 fixed telephones in wireless local loop connections) (1997)

Telephones - mobile cellular: 75,000 (2001)

Telephone system: Facilities are aging but still among the best in Sub-Saharan Africa. High-capacity microwave radio relay connects most larger towns and cities; several cellular telephone services in operation; Internet service is widely available; very small aperture terminal (VSAT) networks are operated by private firms.

Radio broadcast stations: AM 19, FM 5, short-wave 4 (2001)
Radios: 1.2 million (2001)
Television broadcast stations: 9 (2002)
Televisions: 277,000 (1997)
Internet country code: .zm
Internet Service Providers (ISPs): 5 (2001)
Internet users: 25,000 (2002)


~ BE SURE TO VISIT THE SHOPPING SHACK ~
Shipments worldwide ~ plus instant downloads
| Subscription | Books | Software |
Antennas | Components |


IN THIS ISSUE
This month is our 76th online issue! We again include many fine articles by our great writing team. Now, allow me now to introduce this month's line-up of content:


THE AUGUST 2003 ONLINE ISSUE NO. 76 CONTENTS:

OUR MONTHLY COLUMNS (plus this one by yours truly):

FEATURE ARTICLES IN THE LIBRARY:

Notes on Reversible Yagi Arrays
By L.B. Cebik, W4RNL

The reversible wire Yagi array has been around for a long time. There are many ways to construct such arrays, including fancy switching systems in the wire elements, reflector and director loading stubs, and even reflector and director loading using lumped components. These techniques all use the minimum number of wires and electrically or electro- mechanically alter their electrical lengths within the array. We can either change directions using these methods or we can change the properties to peak performance within a given band.

LAB NOTES: Multiband Antennas
with End-Mounted Loading Sections
By Joel C. Hungerford, KB1EGI

Joel got a new perspective on the loaded dipole from this month's exercise. He had not realized that he could put multiple sets of coil/capacity hat combinations in parallel on the end of a dipole cut for the highest desired frequency. Previous experiments showed that a loading coil with a reactance above about 1500 ohms at the frequency set by the center wire section of the dipole blocked any effects of anything beyond the coil. This implied a large coil, which could be tuned over a wide frequency range with a small capacitor made by an extended wire end. It is a Tesla coil antenna!

Antenna Tuner and Filter Analysis
By Fred M. Griffee, N4FG

In many discussions concerning antenna system impedance matching or tuning, reference is made to low or highpass filter configurations. For the lowpass filter itself (or other type filters), it must always be terminated in its designed termination or else its overall characteristic will be far from the desired characteristic. Regarding the antenna tuner, it is recognized as an impedance matching network but also includes some filtering. The low or highpass filter configuration is addressed towards the antenna tuner since there have been many who feel a lowpass configuration is more desirable than a high pass configuration. It will be shown that it makes little difference whether the filter characteristic of an antenna tuner is of the low or highpass configuration when considering harmonic attenuation. In fact, as has been mentioned many times by many including myself, if a harmonic filter is needed, then it should be added to the impedance matching network or external to it at its input where the lowpass filter will be properly terminated at both input and output.

THE MICROVERT ANALYZED: Part 1
By Claudio Re ~ I1RFQ

After Claudio had investigated the performance of the SuperC antenna, he was asked to do the same with the MicroVert. The analysis is presented in two parts: In the first article, we shall investigate the use of modeling software to theoretically predict the performance of the MicroVert. In the second part, we shall discuss measurements of a MicroVert that was built and tested at 50 MHz in various conditions.

Notes on HF General Coverage LPDAs
Using 30-35' Booms
By L.B. Cebik, W4RNL

The most popular range for LPDAs among radio amateurs is 14-30 MHz. Within that range, boom lengths of 30-35' hold considerable interest, since these booms are similar to the ones used for advanced multi-element, multi-band Yagis. In fact, it is quite possible to construct an LPDA with a 30' boom that provides better than 7 dBi free-space gain and better than 20 dB front-to-back ratio across all of the amateur bands included in the passband.

The Compact Cube
By Dan Handelsman, N2DT and Claudio Re, I1RFQ

During the past year, Dan and Claudio have been engaged in designing and testing three different classes of compact antennas. Publication has been held back to satisfy two conditions: the first is testing the designs to make sure that they perform as predicted and the second is protection of the designs by patent filing. Dan has filed for US patents on two designs and Claudio is in the process of patenting his design. All three designs have been built and tested and the designers/authors are satisfied that they perform as expected. This is the beginning of a series of articles about these new cube designs.
 

Well, there you have it, folks—thanks for listening and remember, the reading lamp is always on for you in the reading rooms. If I can be of further help, I'm just a Stone's Throw! away. August 2003 antenneX Online Issue #76
reGARDS, Jack L. Stone, Publisher
jack@antennex.com


Print/Save Article


Send mail to webmaster@antennex.com with questions or comments.
Copyright © 1988-2011 All rights reserved - antenneX©
Last modified: December 31, 2010