The Cube Family Grows!
By Jack L. Stone, Publisher
INTRODUCTION
his
month we have quite a spread of antennas, from the 120-foot tower to the little 3-foot
cubes and several other interesting types in between. As, I write this though I am
reminded by a discussion on the TV news channel about the inherent reception problems that
continue to exist within the cell phone industry. One question was: well why
dont you just put up more towers? The Industry spokesman had a familiar
response It is getting more and more difficult to obtain approval to erect
more towers. Thus, no wonder there is so much pressure to develop a low profile,
high Performance-to-Volume (PTV) antenna. No doubt this market trend worries the tower
manufacturers to some degree.
But, author Tom Cox, KT9OM (Indiana, USA) got his tower for his one-acre backyard, but not without a Herculean effort to convince the local city Zoning Board. Tom was tenacious though and he explains what he did to prepare for his fight in order to win approval in his article WINNING THE ZONING WAR Amateur Towers and Antennas in an Unfriendly World now in the antenneX Archive VI. If anyone is preparing to erect a tower (or other high-profile antenna), it would be advisable to read Tom's earlier article.
Tenacious Tom got board approval for his 120-foot tower and with great joy, commenced construction and eventually thereafter, dealing with the anti-construction factors like bad weather and lost sub-contractors (where do those guys go?), Toms dream came true. The tower was up and he was enjoying his favorite ham radio mostly on VHF, where he has had a lot of fun running the Icom IC-746 on 6M and 2M, using a pair of loops or a Yagi on Six, and a Yagi on Two. Both antennas are atop his 120-foot tower allowing QSOs with many states and some DX on Six, and several contacts out to several hundred miles on Two.
This winter, Tom wanted to re-acquaint himself with life on the HF bands, especially on 160M, where he had limited success in the past, due in part to the lack of a good antenna. Since he had the new tower to attach more things to, Tom decided to hang a half-sloper for 160M at the 80-foot level and see what developed. Alas, his new half-sloper was the unexpected cause of some consternation. While it worked well on 160M transmit, which is approximately what it's cut for, but it also works TOO well on the AM band, and there's the rub now that Tom must find a solution for an elusive problem in the realm of RFI so familiar to many. To share with the readers, Tom has written an excellent article, A Half-Sloper, a Tower and RFI all about this experience in this month's issue.
STORM THE CASTLE!
BTW, although Tom was successful in obtaining the board approval for his tower, he still
has yet to gain neighborhood approval again, a familiar issue to many. Once it is
learned you are "broadcasting" within a neighborhood, watch out! You may not be
the most popular member of that community. These are the folks who do the voting on those
restrictive municipal propositions! Tom managed to slip through, but will the next to
propose a tower who is not as well prepared as Tom when he stood before the Zoning
BoardTom may have been lucky that no member of the board was from his neighborhood?
MEANWHILE, SEARCHING FOR SOLUTIONS
If the reader has been following the events reported here, mainly over the past 5 years,
we have seen many, many concepts emerge with the intent of at least bringing us closer to
a solution to the trend, which threatens the high-profile antenna. Of course,
I refer to the many devices now commonly known as compact antennas and even those
that claim to have shortened the profile. Some of those have shown more promise while
others have shown less. Best of all, the search has become relentless and that in itself
shows promise of eventual solution for an ideal device that produces the desired PVT.
HANDS ACROSS THE SEA
In February, 2003, Dan
Handelsman (New York, USA) and Claudio Re, (Turin, Italy) in their search for the
Holy Grail of Compact Antennas, realized that both were independently
attempting to shrink an antenna inside a cube of a dimension arbitrarily set to WL/20 (a
tenth of a WL/2 dipole), as seen in the illustration below. They got in touch with each
other and decided to combine their efforts through various mutual agreements.

The Cubic space compared with a WL/2 Dipole
Dan began with
a loop and ended with the C-Cube, which is tuned with capacitors. Re started with a dipole and ended with the
L-Cube, which is tuned with inductors. Strangely,
the C-Cube behaved like a dipole and the L-Cube like a loop. This was so
because of the dualism of the behavior of series and parallel
resonances of these antennas. This phenomenon demonstrates how the extremes of a design
often perform full 360-degree turns.
Dan and Re consolidated their
designs and patented them in the so-called Cube Family, which includes all
possible variations. Dan began from the modeling point of view and Re from the field of measurements and
engineering, but both performed both modeling and measurements to independently test the results.
This
months article describes the evolution of the development of the C-Cube and the
L-Cube. The L-Cube will be more fully discussed in the next article of this series. There
is yet another design that will be discussed in the future, that of the very promising
H-Cube.
Development Status of the C-Cube
After the C-Cube was introduced - in antenneX
in article series Parts I and II - Re suggested that it would be more practical to
mechanically support the antenna by moving the cold part of the antenna closer
to its center of gravity. Re accomplished this with the Double Folded Cube design. The
antenna is shown in the modeling screenshot below. This design was elaborated on in Part
III.

Further tests and measurements by both inventors showed some departures from the modeling results of the C-Cube. At the present time, work is underway to remedy this problem and the results will be presented in a future article. In the meantime, it has been decided to present the L-Cube and, subsequently, the H-Cube designs.
The L-Cube
The basic idea came from a short balanced dipole inductively loaded and with capacitive hats, filling the target WL/20 cubic space. This design is similar to the ANTAP, which is to be found in the third article of that series in this months issue of antenneX. The ANTAP is an antenna designed for used in tight places like apartments, etc.

So, now we have the C-Cube and the L-Cube, which basically takes up the same amount of space, except one acts like a dipole and the other like a loop! Looks like we have the right size for most needs and is now just a question of learning about the test results. The Dan and Re team are to be congratulated on their tireless efforts and apparent positive results on the Cube Family designs. Perhaps with the H-Cube also in the works, another child is on the way!
Claudio is not satisfied with just building antennas. He really enjoys analyzing and testing them too. During the past month, we introduced some new software by Claudio and his partner, Oscar Steila, IK1XPV, both of Italy. In case you missed the new product announcement, below is a copy:
*** Unique New Radio/Antenna Software Release *** CIAOradio, or Computer Interface Audio Out Radio, is a program for using a Personal Computer equipped with a full duplex audio card as a demodulator receiver plus signal level analyzer for Radio Amateur application. Before, few radio amateurs could afford access to the sophisticated and costly equipment needed to make these tests with reasonable precision now provided by this very affordable software: With a Personal Computer running Windows, you can: This exciting new software is developed by Claudio Re, I1RFQ and Oscar Steila, IK1XPV of Italy and was introduced in their co-authored article published by antenneX in the December 2003 issue. The article is entitled: A New Digital World: The "CIAO Radio Project." A link to the article, plus details about the
software is provided in the URL below: antenneX is pleased to bring another great product to
its shelves in the Shopping Shack. Be sure to check the main menu for more great stuff: |
ANTENNA DISCUSSION LIST
In my last couple of columns, I have chosen "A Likeable Thread" from
our antenna discussion mail list. Moreover, I have always stated that it was my
personal choice and not necessarily one other may choose as being "most
likeable."
This past month's discussion activities have made it too difficult to make my usual choice, mainly because the discussions covered a very wide variety of subjects primarily about the basic aspects of antennas and its components. Not that they were simple subjects, but more about the application of the basics and how to use them in different ways. Following is a summary of some of the subjects covered in the 244 messages in January 2004 discussions:
The new Antenna Discussion List is a infinite fountain of ideas making it a great "watering hole" for exchange of ideas, questions and answers on a wide range of antenna-related subjects.
If you havent already joined, you are invited and encouraged to do so. Just click here and follow the instructions on how to join and have fun with the rest of us. If you don't participateit's a big opportunity lost!
==================================== |
AN INVITATION TO CONTRIBUTORS
antenneX
thrives on the contributions of antenna experimenters, ranging from the informal home shop
construction project to the theoretical investigation of basic antenna, feedline, and
propagation phenomena. Over the years, we have published articles on the use of new or
newly adapted materials, known antennas adapted to new circumstances, modifications of
antenna structures, basic explorations of both common and unusual antennas, antenna
modeling exercises, design improvements, antenna matching techniques from both a physical
and mathematical perspective, evaluations of mini-antennas and their underlying theory of
operation, new and patentable designs, propagation tutorials, and.... The list goes on,
since no antenna-related topic is irrelevant to the readers of antenneX.
At the same time, antenneX has experienced continuous growth in its
readershipfor which we are appreciative. However, all readers can help us do even
better. How? By submitting an article every now and then based on your current antenna
work that may be useful at any level to other readers.
Among the engineering and researching readers, there are undoubtedly
a number of unclassified and non-proprietary findings that antenneX readers would
like to know. Among the practical antenna designers, there are ideas, tests, and numerous
other practical findings to benefit our readers. Antenna builders very likely have some
techniques to share with other readers. Besides the regular articles, we always have the
home work shop column for shorter practical ideas and we always have the invited news and
editorial column for information about new technologies, future advances, lost old but
good ideas, and personal views on the good to bad things that are happening in the world
of antennas and propagation.
If you are uncertain about whether your ideas merit an article, please feel free to send
an outline to the general editor/publishers at submissions@antennex.com . Do not feel that you must be ready to be a regular submitter to write for antenneX,
because we welcome the individual contribution as much as monthly articles. As well, do
not believe that the slots in each issue are already spoken forwe shall always make
room for a worthy article.
To see details of our writing guidelines, please look at: Writing for antenneX
THE SPAM-VIRUS UPDATES
I have made a habit of passing along anything of interest regarding the Internet and
e-mail services. In previous columns, I have discussed at great lengths the issue of SPAM
and virus/worm emails as and when they appear as a new threat to our readership. By doing
so, I feel antenneX can help make a difference in the war against those intruders.
Hopefully, if we inform 60,000+ readers, and those readers tell two other people, that
would be almost 300,000 people who would be armed with early information and help prevent
the infection and further spread of these little devils. Since we run several mail
servers, we see those intruders right from the start. By the time you hear it in the TV
news, your computer may already be infected.
| Did you know that recent surveys show the percentage of SPAM to total emails has increased from 8% to almost 60% in just TWO years?!? Source: MSNBC News |
After a couple of months of relief from the Sobig virus attack, up jumped some new viruses this past month. As soon as we saw them in our computer logs, we tracked down the necessary background info from our sources and notified those on our announcement mail list. For those who may have missed that warning, here is a copy:
**** Dangerous Virri on the Prowl **** This is a public service announcement by antenneX Online Magazine. Over the past week, we have seen two more mass-mailing viruses, W32/Bagle and W32/Novarg, impact a significant number of home users and sites. -- Systems Affected -- Overview -- Description Because we are trusting and curious, social engineering is often effective. The widespread impact of these latest viruses, which rely on human intervention to help propagate the spread, demonstrates the effectiveness of social engineering. -- Safe Look at the Actual Virus Example If you are reading this, then you ARE involved and a target of this or some future flood of similar attacks. Knowledge is powerful. By informing the thousands on our mail lists will help to thwart and reduce the damage of similar attacks. For a look at an example of one we call MyDoom,
please go here: We will continue this policy of disseminating information and dangers that we learn about via the Internet. Jack L. Stone |
FEEDBACK
By the way, I was a bit amused by one reader feedback to my virus alert
above (who shall remain anonymous) that took me to task over the use of the term
"social engineering." I thought I would also include that feedback message and
my public response to it here today, just in case anyone else was scratching their heads
over the use of that terminology because I may use it again in the future.
The feedback message:
Jack,
I appreciate the efforts you have made at antenneX to inform people about security issues on the internet.
I have seen the term "social engineering" used in a similar way internally at Lucent Technologies, my employer. Your email was the first instance I have seen of this usage outside of work.
Unfortunately, the usage is wrong, and trivializes a very important political idea. The term "social engineering" has been used for decades to describe efforts to reform society by, well, lets just call them reformers. The term is a scornful reference to these efforts.
The use of the term to describe industrial espionage and now email scams is incorrect and not very helpful. Industrial espionage is much better described as "industrial espionage". Similarly, email scams are much better described as "email scams". Saying "social engineering" to refer to these things only obscures what is meant, and, I suppose, makes the person who uses the term feel more important or in the know.
So please, lets say what we mean and leave the term "social engineering" in the pages of political journals, where it belongs.
Regards, [anonymous]
By pure definition, social engineering means:
Now, if I were to pick nits, these are not "email scams" either by definition. A scam is defined as:
As applied to the viruses in question here, it is not a business scheme or business swindle because the creator(s) want to hide their identity and thus, never receive any direct benefit from the propagation, except perhaps some sort of anti-social satisfaction. In other words, to deceive and knowingly gain at the expense of others. Whereas, an email virus is not unlike the activities of a terrorist who might employ the use of a deadly virus such as anthrax, etc. to destroy.
Therefore, email scams might go well with describing SPAM, but not a virus.
I think we can agree on the main thing: Email virus attacks of any description are certainly annoying if not a bad thing!
[1] Excerpted from The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition Copyright © 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V., further reproduction and distribution restricted in accordance with the Copyright Law of the United States. All rights reserved.
Subscribe for the Premium Feature Articles!
Enjoy these new concepts with our readership: Be sure your subscription is active so you don't miss these new and exciting concepts and more to follow. If you are thinking about subscribing or renewing, save 21% with the 2-year subscription. Just go to this URL and check on the Subscription option of your choice.
http://www.antennex.com/signup.htm
Keep the issues coming and stay on the leading edge of antenna technology!
~ BE SURE TO VISIT THE SHOPPING SHACK ~
Shipments worldwide ~ plus instant downloads
| Subscription | Books | Software | Antennas | Components |
IN THIS ISSUE
This month is our 82nd online issue! We again include many fine articles by our great writing team. Now, allow me now to introduce this month's line-up of content:
THE FEBRUARY 2004 ONLINE ISSUE NO. 82 CONTENTS:
OUR MONTHLY COLUMNS (plus this one by yours truly):
FEATURE ARTICLES IN THE LIBRARY:
Notes
on the Batwing |
| In Part 1 of this short series of notes on the batwing antenna, we examined the basic dipole-like properties of the antenna. We found it to have about 3 dB gain over a conventional dipole, along with a very wide bandwidth. The gain is a function of the compression of higher angle radiation due to the antenna's vertically symmetrical structure. The wide bandwidth results essentially from having very closely coupled dipoles of different lengths. |
Lab Notes: The Litz Loop |
| During the past three months Joel investigated the effect of changing the surface area of a magnetic loop, while holding all other parameters constant and investigated the effect of changing the circumference of one or more parallel connected loops without changing the planes or tuning capacitance. This month Joel continues the look at surface area this time using a Litz wire configuration - a bundle of smaller enamel coated wires that add up to the desired surface area. This configuration is found to add a new parameter to the loop: the mutual inductance between the wires. |
Transformer
Magnetic Coupling & Matching |
| In Fred's previous article, he included examples related to various areas of a toroid type transformer design. This month's article is a continuation and has become Part II. Some of the areas mentioned in Part I related to the coefficient of coupling being assumed to safely equal unity when using a bifilar winding. Some past measurements used in Part II indicated that the coefficient of coupling did not equal or approach unity too closely. These data are included showing predicted values for the coefficient of coupling. |
THE
"ANTAP" Apartment Antenna: Part III |
| There is a big demand in the USA for an HF Apartment-sized Antenna that could continuously tune in the range of frequencies from 3-30 MHz. Local and regional regulations often prohibit the use of exterior antennas. Many of the dwellings are built with wood, which is a not a bad insulating material when dry. Many homes have in the highest part of the house as an apartment or an attic where Hams want to put their antennas. However attic apartment space is often limited. This article describes the development of an antenna suitable for this purposes called ANTAP (ANTenna for APartments). |
A
Half-Sloper, a Tower and RFI |
| This winter, Tom wanted to re-acquaint himself with life on the HF bands, especially on 160M, where he had had limited success in the past, due in part to the lack of a good antenna. Since he had the new tower to attach more things to, Tom decided to hang a half-sloper for 160M at the 80-foot level and see what developed. His new half-sloper was the unexpected cause of some consternation. While it worked well on 160M transmit, which is approximately what it's cut for, but it also works TOO well on the AM band, and there's the rub now that Tom must find a solution for an elusive problem in the realm of RFI so familiar to many. |
Historical
Overview |
| We have the C-Cube and this month the new L-Cube, which basically takes up the same amount of physical space, except one acts like a dipole and the other like a loop! Looks like we have the right size for most needs and just a question of learning more from the test results. The Dan and Re team are to be congratulated on their tireless efforts and apparent positive results on the Cube Family designs. Moreover, an H-Cube is being developed for its own uniqueness. Perhaps with the H-Cube also in the works, another child is on the way! |
Well, there you have it, folksthanks for listening and
remember, the reading lamp is always on for you in the reading rooms. If I can be of
further help, I'm just a Stone's Throw! away. February
2004 antenneX Online Issue #82
reGARDS, Jack L. Stone, Publisher jack@antennex.com
Send mail to webmaster@antennex.com
with questions or comments.
Copyright © 1988-2011 All rights reserved - antenneX©
Last modified:
December 31, 2010